Page 1 of 1

retard timing question

PostPosted: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:57 +0000
by ger
what is a good final retard at standard greddy boost (5.5psi i think) using 97 to 99 octane petrol. I started at 14 down to 6, yesterday i tried out a final setting of 8.

I have the bipipes set to start retarding at 2500 rpm and full retard at 3800rpm

fergus are you running 10 degress under boost?

ger

PostPosted: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 7:14 +0000
by virtualcolm
Who are you calling a retard?

:)

PostPosted: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 7:19 +0000
by mx5ash
:lol: :lol: :lol:

PostPosted: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:02 +0000
by Fergus
Is dis da retarddad post ? Do I gotta post somephink up ear now or wha ? Why yu askin me abot timeings an all dat stuff, tis to feckin complacateded, wha da I no abot dis time thingy thing ding.

But, yes I am running with 10 degrees timing and 6PSI with no intercooler (sleeper setup just now....soon to change) and no Bipes etc.
Works fine, always has except when I got a crap load of fuel in my tank. Never went back to that place. Oh and BTW, dont bother to pay that little bit extra for that fuel with the 'extra' octane in it cause tis crap. Normal unleaded is just fine which is way better then the stuff they use in the IS....IF your engine was fine before fitting the Turbo that is (remember Seanie ?).

PostPosted: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:05 +0000
by Fergus
(PS) Dont know about using the Bipes with the Greddy kit. But if your running 5.5 - 6PSI without Bipes then the timing should be at 6 degress base, that is down from the factory setting of 10 degrees.

(PPS) But I'm set at 10 :shock:

Re: retard timing question

PostPosted: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:43 +0000
by Steve
ger wrote:what is a good final retard at standard greddy boost (5.5psi i think) using 97 to 99 octane petrol. I started at 14 down to 6, yesterday i tried out a final setting of 8.

I have the bipipes set to start retarding at 2500 rpm and full retard at 3800rpm

fergus are you running 10 degress under boost?

ger


That sounds sensible Ger.

PostPosted: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 1:20 +0000
by ger
Maxol are selling E5 on all their pumps now its 95 unleaded with 5% bio-ethanol its rated at 99 octane, the claim its safe for all unleaded cars and costs the same as regular unleded.

I have run a few tanks of this and it seems fine.

My point being better fuel less chance of knock at higher timing

base timing of 8 makes a quite a difference, gave the car a bit of a lashing on the way to dublin yesterday, no knock or pinking.

PostPosted: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 1:45 +0000
by Steve
Good stuff Ger, might try a tank of it this week.

PostPosted: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 7:42 +0000
by leamyj
Question for the turbo guys...
How much more , if at all, is your fuel consumption on average, in comparison with the normally aspirated engines??
Would really fancy a turbo version at some time in the future but the way that fuel prices have been heading would have me thinking again :? :?

John

PostPosted: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 8:13 +0000
by Steve
In and around the same ...

Month of July last year :
last tank miles : last tank kms : last tank fill - litres : date : MPG last tank :
233.125 : 373 : 34.26 : 08/07/2007 : 30.89280502 :
170 : 272 : 33.65 : 18/07/2007 : 22.93610698 :
135.625 : 217 : 21.49 : 21/07/2007 : 28.65228013 :
138.125 : 221 : 24.3 : 22/07/2007 : 25.80606996 :


Think Frank gets into the early forties tho (waaay better tuning than mine.. gotta get a wideband O2 sensor..).
Steve

PostPosted: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:13 +0000
by Fergus
I think I already posted how many kms I get since I boosted mine, WAY better milage once T'd !
Fook, I've gone 'GREEN' and got a Turbo :lol:

PostPosted: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 7:10 +0000
by leamyj
Thanks for that guys, there's a surprise for me...better economy when turbo'd...Hmmm

I suppose a lot of it is down to driving style , along with all the other factors.

John